@dibblego @puffnfresh @getify @davetchepak @djspiewak algorithms my ass.
-
-
Replying to @bitemyapp
@bitemyapp@puffnfresh@getify@davetchepak@djspiewak I agree, nobody seriously looks at types and says, "don't need that."2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@puffnfresh@getify@davetchepak@djspiewak nobody that really *knows* anything about types willingly eschews them.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bitemyapp
@bitemyapp@dibblego@puffnfresh@getify@davetchepak@djspiewak This statement is simply false.2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @samth1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes
-
Replying to @bitemyapp
@bitemyapp@dibblego@puffnfresh@djspiewak (a) that comic is an admission that your claim is false (b) the claim in the comic is also false1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @samth
@samth@bitemyapp@puffnfresh@djspiewak demonstrate it to be false, because otherwise it is a well understood expedience of many.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@samth@puffnfresh@djspiewak I'm pretty sure the burden of proof is on the group of people ignoring the research.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bitemyapp
@bitemyapp@samth@puffnfresh@djspiewak I can tell you the names of every single person in the smallest set. There are two of them.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@samth@puffnfresh@djspiewak I'm actually curious, who?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@bitemyapp @samth @puffnfresh @djspiewak on second thought only one left -> @psnively
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.