@getify @davetchepak types are about proving the absence of bugs. Why is that ludicrous?
@samth @bitemyapp @puffnfresh @djspiewak demonstrate it to be false, because otherwise it is a well understood expedience of many.
-
-
@dibblego@samth@puffnfresh@djspiewak I'm pretty sure the burden of proof is on the group of people ignoring the research. -
@bitemyapp@samth@puffnfresh@djspiewak I can tell you the names of every single person in the smallest set. There are two of them. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@dibblego@bitemyapp@puffnfresh@djspiewak Telling your interlocutors that they don't themselves exist is unlikely to be persuasive. -
@samth@bitemyapp@puffnfresh@djspiewak I am compelling you to PLEASE show me where I am wrong. This is my position until such time. - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.