@puffnfresh Because that's the syntax these people know how to read.
-
-
Replying to @dcsobral
@dcsobral@puffnfresh The syntax is never the barrier. Despite protests by those who are yet to get it, I promise this.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@puffnfresh Oh, yes, it is a barrier. I can't read it, despite knowing what it must be saying.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dcsobral
@dcsobral@dibblego@puffnfresh it's hard to understand monad when everyone invents his out way to explain it1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kemnet
@kemnet@dibblego@puffnfresh Since there are many concepts that can and are explained in many different ways, why is monad different?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dcsobral
@kemnet@dibblego@puffnfresh I find it hard to explain monads without types, but no need to use unfamiliar notation to explain the laws.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dcsobral
@dcsobral@dibblego@puffnfresh it's ok, usually, but very few focus on laws and abilities they provide but try to extrapolate from examples1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kemnet
@kemnet@dibblego@puffnfresh Some people have deductive minds, some people have inductive minds.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dcsobral
@dcsobral@dibblego@puffnfresh so true, as for me the best explanation that already became a joke :) http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3870088/a-monad-is-just-a-monoid-in-the-category-of-endofunctors-whats-the-problem …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kemnet
@kemnet@dibblego@puffnfresh It's the first one that I understood without reservations. :) Well, after I started on Category Theory. :)3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@dcsobral @kemnet @puffnfresh there are a lot of noisy people who claim to understand but do not because they were given a broken idea...
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.