@mraleph being unable to write correct programs w/o type enforcement is like being unable to drive w/o guard rails to "guide" the car.
-
-
Replying to @DanShappir
@DanShappir i'm fine w/ people who want type enforce. i don't but… what i'm not fine w/ is people saying missing types are a flaw.@mraleph3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @getify
@getify@DanShappir if you have a tool that you force almost everybody to use then missing types are a flaw because some people need them1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @vamsee
@vamsee@mraleph@getify this debate is as old as programming http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/search/node/static+type …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanShappir
@DanShappir@vamsee@mraleph those who prefer type enforcement often seem to look down on those who don't, as inferior. reverse rarely true.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@getify @DanShappir @vamsee @mraleph There's a difference between thinking you're inferior and knowing you're wrong http://blogs.perl.org/users/ovid/2010/08/what-to-know-before-debating-type-systems.html …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.