The #CSharp language has this `default` keyword which breaks parametricity. It has no redeeming benefits. It is awful.
-
@davetchepak@dibblego Unfortunately the "default" keyword seems to be a necessary evil... not sure why they split type params in refs/value
@mausch @davetchepak Is it really? If I delete it, am I worse off? All I need is a first-class var (ST), then I am good to go innit?
-
-
@dibblego@davetchepak Yes, but I meant in the context of the current .NET type system. -
@mausch@davetchepak I can write a library that uses default once, then never use it again and be at least as productive. - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.