@psnively @springrod @puffnfresh Sorry, I didn't know that. Since OO is a thing (what?), why is it bad?
@springrod @puffnfresh Noone has ever said, "OO is bad" or "OO is second-class" or similar. It's very important for you to understand this.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@psnively@dibblego@springrod@puffnfresh OO is oversold, and proponents misunderstand type theory, but is it *intrinsically* bad?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@psnively@dibblego@springrod@puffnfresh Having attempted to kill it entirely in the past, it's still a tool in my toolbox today.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@psnively@dibblego@springrod@puffnfresh You're the one who said it was bad, so you go first. :)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@psnively@dibblego@springrod@puffnfresh If C++ and Java weren't so widely used, I'd say it was a strawman.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@psnively@dibblego@springrod@puffnfresh My memories of OCaml included hitting some dead ends with functors. Maybe it's better now.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@psnively@dibblego@springrod@puffnfresh I did use OCaml's OO facilities, more for lighter syntax than anything. obj#foo vs. Mod.foo objThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@psnively@springrod@puffnfresh How does OO relate to subclassing & subtyping?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@dibblego@springrod@puffnfresh OO is God. -
@nuttycom@springrod@puffnfresh I concur, OO is a neuropsychological phenomena explained by the same theories as god. - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.