Actually, down with all libraries/packages. We should have function managers, not package managers.
-
-
-
Replying to @milessabin
@milessabin@puffnfresh Modules should be ad-hoc and orthogonal to the functions contained. Up to the users to standardize, not designers.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @nuttycom
@nuttycom@puffnfresh what mechanism though? ML/Haskell/Scala style? Something else?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @milessabin
@milessabin@puffnfresh The same functions can be exported independently by multiple modules.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nuttycom
@nuttycom@puffnfresh gotcha ... that jibes well with some ideas I've been toying with recently /cc@d61 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @milessabin
@milessabin@puffnfresh@d6 What to do with versioning becomes an interesting issue.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nuttycom
@nuttycom@d6@milessabin do you want putStrLn :: String -> IO () version 1.1.3 or version 1.4? Uh...3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @puffnfresh
@puffnfresh@d6@milessabin Function deps improves this somewhat... no need to version putStrLn to version some other unrelated function.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@nuttycom @puffnfresh @d6 @milessabin let's do it!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.