Tony Morris

@EyalL and I am totally cool with this new definition of OOP, which is, "completely ridiculous code that does nothing more than ceremony."

@dibblego it's a very old def of oop, it's what encap. et al mean

@EyalL No, really, it isn't and appeals to tradition doesn't help me any. Believe me, I have read all of those books and ceremonious texts.

@dibblego the question is about a definition from tradition, so inherently appealing to tradition?

@EyalL Back to my original point. OOP is a bunch of bullshit supported by logical fallacy and neurosis. I'm cool with that if you imply so.

@dibblego when we use records of functions in Haskell it's basically a technique from the oop world

@EyalL OK, now I think you are joking.

@dibblego btw did fp use this technique before e.g Simula/Smalltalk? It's somewhat likely it did originate from there