@EyalL If "unit" is a usable concept, then "not a unit" can be demonstrated. I also happen to know that you won't be able to do this.
-
@dibblego data (typically mutable) and methods to manipulate it (some exposed). Ability to have units extend/override data/methods of others
@EyalL This what I allude to when I say you are leaking abstraction, violating encapsulation and you most definitely do not have a "unit."
-
-
@EyalL I do not know why you suggested these things as the definition of (or related to) OOP.
End of conversation
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.