@rickasaurus @missingfaktor @mandubian @djspiewak @larsr_h so composing modules recursively is a welcome feature ..
-
-
Replying to @debasishg
@debasishg@missingfaktor@mandubian@djspiewak@larsr_h Perhaps you could have both with something like extension methods4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rickasaurus
@rickasaurus@debasishg@mandubian@djspiewak@larsr_h .. below it - http://www.haskellforall.com/2012/05/scrap-your-type-classes.html ….1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @missingfaktor
@missingfaktor@debasishg@mandubian@djspiewak@larsr_h The "Value-level programming is safer" point is enlightened I think1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rickasaurus2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @missingfaktor
@missingfaktor@debasishg@mandubian@djspiewak@larsr_h They might be more focused on practical safety than the haskell community2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rickasaurus
@rickasaurus@missingfaktor@debasishg@mandubian@djspiewak@larsr_h you just fell in a trap that I once did too.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@rickasaurus I don't understand what notion of safety is being discussed. Scala has instance incoherency issues. Unscalable.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cartazio
@cartazio@rickasaurus …and that is just the tip of the iceberg.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@rickasaurus @cartazio There are scala users who take safety seriously and a lot who pretend. This has caused a widening schism.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.