@dibblego actually I'm not sure I get it. Are you saying that a human at 60kph against a bird at 10kph is less dangerous than both at 10?
-
-
Replying to @etorreborre
@dibblego also you think there are no studies showing the increased injuries with speed when there is an accident?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @etorreborre
@etorreborre I am certain there are no studies to support the statement and I am certain it is not true.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego so you don't believe http://bit.ly/12yAD7p and there must be studies showing the opposite then1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @etorreborre
@etorreborre I agree with this link but not your assessment of risk. They are very very very very very distinct.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @etorreborre
@etorreborre definitely not. Another encyclopedia of situations to select from to falsify this statement. It is an open universe.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @etorreborre
@etorreborre The idea that you can draw a correlate is the objection. You cannot and I need only select a trivial situation to falsify it.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@etorreborre what are you meaning by speed? Velocity or speed limit law?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.