@etorreborre by the way, it is rate of change of speed, not velocity.
-
-
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego my physics is rusty but I was thinking about that: E_k = 1/2mv^2 - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinetic_energy …2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @etorreborre
@etorreborre Are you really going to suggest that slower correlates to less fatalities? I will helmet cam a ride at 10kph.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego if *everyone* drives slower, there's less energy involved, hence less risk of death: http://bit.ly/12yAD7p1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @etorreborre
@etorreborre I am refusing to believe you believe that.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @etorreborre
@etorreborre The bird strike from behind at 60kph caused a headache. The one at 10kph caused fatal head injury.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @etorreborre
@etorreborre You agree that a generalisation like that is false?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@etorreborre I am saying there is at least one situation where your generalisation is categorically false.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.