@dibblego @kaleidic @notcalledjack in that case it is a social attempt to enforce SafeHaskell over Haskell
-
-
Replying to @jneira
@jneira@kaleidic@notcalledjack If idiomatic code means "not being silly", then why do I see it used so often to mean "be extremely silly"?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@kaleidic@notcalledjack well, we can discuss if use a subset of a lang can be "good" itself or about concretes subsets/langs1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jneira
@jneira@kaleidic@notcalledjack This is so confusing. Are you really sure there is something useful behind all this? Really?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @amandalaucher
@pandamonial I, too, see "patterns" as the same general topic as "idioms." That idea won't relieve@dibblego of his suspicions, I'll guess.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kaleidic
@kaleidic@pandamonial Well, I am far more certain that "patterns" is a useless concept.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @amandalaucher
@dibblego I like having the ability to flip the bozo bit when someone says they've implemented the blabbidy-blah pattern@kaleidic1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@pandamonial @kaleidic They might say to me that they implemented the blabbidy-blah pattern. I will say to myself they are just being silly.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.