@kaleidic @notcalledjack @EyalL I don't like or dislike it. I don't know what it means, and it seems nobody else does either.
-
-
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@notcalledjack@EyalL It's a vague, non-formal idea. But lots of vague, non-formal ideas are valuable, even in programming.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kaleidic
@kaleidic@notcalledjack@EyalL I keep hearing this allegation of value.6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@kaleidic@notcalledjack you can write impure functions in haskell all the time but it's idiomatic to write pure ones1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jneira
@jneira@kaleidic@notcalledjack So idiomatic is the set difference between Haskell and SafeHaskell?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@kaleidic@notcalledjack in that case it is a social attempt to enforce SafeHaskell over Haskell1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jneira
@jneira@kaleidic@notcalledjack If idiomatic code means "not being silly", then why do I see it used so often to mean "be extremely silly"?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@kaleidic@notcalledjack well, we can discuss if use a subset of a lang can be "good" itself or about concretes subsets/langs1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jneira
@jneira@kaleidic@notcalledjack This is so confusing. Are you really sure there is something useful behind all this? Really?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@kaleidic as@notcalledjack said, use a subset of a lang makes you have to think less2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@jneira @kaleidic @notcalledjack I agree, but which subset? The idiomatic one? Which one is that? And why anyway?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.