@djspiewak @darinmorrison I just want to clear on your position. It is very obvious a beginner mistake. I'd rather just learn it and move on
-
-
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@darinmorrison My position is that the runtime which gives meaning to a program is part of the program.1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @djspiewak
@djspiewak@darinmorrison I can see how you might think this is true but it cannot make sense no matter how I look at it.7 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@darinmorrison Drawing the line at runtime is very interesting when thinking about things from a language design perspective.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @djspiewak
@djspiewak@darinmorrison so I can point to anything and say "that is a program" and this is useful?2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@darinmorrison No, perhaps not useful, but it’s a definition, you can’t just dismiss it because you see no immediate use.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @djspiewak
@djspiewak@darinmorrison I dismiss it because it is arbitrary nonsense.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@darinmorrison ALL of it is arbitrary nonsense. It’s just that some of it is *useful* arbitrary nonsense.1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @djspiewak
@djspiewak@darinmorrison the ability to say, "that is not a program" is a pre-requisite to utility. It allows implies absence of arbitrary3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@darinmorrison And there are reasons to chose definitions other than the one which draws the line at the code boundary.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
@djspiewak @darinmorrison there probably are but we have not seen one of those today.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.