@djspiewak @darinmorrison I think you are under-estimating how obviously wrong the statement is and also how often it is said.
-
-
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@darinmorrison Just because you have asserted something to be wrong, does not make it so.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @djspiewak
@djspiewak@darinmorrison wait a minute I proved it to be wrong and I can continually demonstrate this all you like.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@darinmorrison You have done no such thing.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @djspiewak
@djspiewak@darinmorrison so reducing "the core of your objection" to absurdity is not a demonstration that you are wrong?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@darinmorrison As I tweeted earlier, my IO example was spurious, *wrong* and didn’t demonstrate my point.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @djspiewak
@djspiewak@darinmorrison so bring up the next challenge and let's destroy that too. There is no way you are able to make sense here.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@darinmorrison You haven’t destroyed anything other than my incorrect IO example THAT I ALREADY SAID WAS WRONG.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @djspiewak
@djspiewak@darinmorrison so you said it was the core of your objection, which was wrong, but you are still right, but not telling?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@darinmorrison *sigh* No, I have laid out my reasoning. You have refused to read it. Forward progress cannot be attained as such.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@djspiewak @darinmorrison I read it loud and clear.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.