"If you were programming with functions your program wouldn't do anything." -- @djspiewak Isn't that early Haskell? #LambdaJam
-
-
Replying to @casio_juarez
@casio_juarez@djspiewak that is just wrong. You can program with only functions now in Haskell and it does things! Amazing.1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @puffnfresh
@puffnfresh@casio_juarez Your functions aren't pure though if it's doing something. My assertion is a form of the old "box is getting warm"3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @djspiewak
@djspiewak@casio_juarez no, my functions are pure. Yes, Haskell still performs effects.4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @puffnfresh
@puffnfresh@casio_juarez This abstraction is a lie though, and it *does* leak. In the end, no Haskell program is exclusively functions.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @djspiewak
@djspiewak@casio_juarez#wat, abstraction? IO is pure and it doesn't leak. Haskell programs are functions.2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @puffnfresh
@puffnfresh@casio_juarez Here is the core of my objection: a = liftM (\ a -> [a, a]) getLine b = sequence [getLine, getLine]2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@djspiewak @puffnfresh @casio_juarez Here is a reduction to absurdity of the core of your objection https://gist.github.com/tonymorris/5975004 … @runarorama
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.