"If you were programming with functions your program wouldn't do anything." -- @djspiewak Isn't that early Haskell? #LambdaJam
-
-
Replying to @casio_juarez
@casio_juarez@djspiewak that is just wrong. You can program with only functions now in Haskell and it does things! Amazing.1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @puffnfresh
@puffnfresh@casio_juarez Your functions aren't pure though if it's doing something. My assertion is a form of the old "box is getting warm"3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @djspiewak
@djspiewak@casio_juarez no, my functions are pure. Yes, Haskell still performs effects.4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @puffnfresh
@puffnfresh@casio_juarez Without impurity, you have no input, no output, and no evaluation.7 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @djspiewak
@djspiewak@puffnfresh@casio_juarez this is emphatically untrue. It is also propagated on scala making lists. Welcome to the other side.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego it's also on Haskell wiki: "keep the code involving state and I/O to the minimum as impure code" http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Functional_programming …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@andrewfnewman Boo. Fix it.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.