@coltfred @eed3si9n @d6 @huitseeker Maybe not what @dibblego has in mind, but I find `for ((x,_)<-List((1,2),3)) yield x` pretty horrifying.
-
-
Replying to @travisbrown
@travisbrown@coltfred@eed3si9n@d6@huitseeker@dibblego whats the problem here, that scala allows that?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @channingwalton
@channingwalton@travisbrown@coltfred@eed3si9n@d6@huitseeker#Scala allowing List ((1, 2), 3) past type checking is ludicrous.2 replies 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@travisbrown@coltfred@eed3si9n@d6@huitseeker finding the common super type is wrong?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @channingwalton
@channingwalton@travisbrown@coltfred@eed3si9n@d6@huitseeker delaying errors to runtime for zero benefit is wrong.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@travisbrown@coltfred@eed3si9n@d6@huitseeker so scala should not infer the common supertype? (sorry, trying to understand)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @channingwalton
@channingwalton@travisbrown@coltfred@eed3si9n@d6@huitseeker with implications like this, no it should not do this specific thing.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@travisbrown@coltfred@eed3si9n@d6@huitseeker specifically in the case of inferring Any?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @channingwalton
@channingwalton@travisbrown@coltfred@eed3si9n@d6@huitseeker specifically for this List value. It should not be a representable thing1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@travisbrown@coltfred@eed3si9n@d6@huitseeker specifically for List that ends up with List[Any]?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@channingwalton @travisbrown @coltfred @eed3si9n @d6 @huitseeker Any as it stands, is useless with huge cost
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.