@coltfred @eed3si9n @d6 @huitseeker @travisbrown Yeah but won't fit in a twittle.
-
-
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@eed3si9n@d6@huitseeker@travisbrown Mind constructing a gist when you have some time? I'm very interested.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @travisbrown
@travisbrown@coltfred@eed3si9n@d6@huitseeker@dibblego whats the problem here, that scala allows that?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @channingwalton
@channingwalton@travisbrown@coltfred@eed3si9n@d6@huitseeker#Scala allowing List ((1, 2), 3) past type checking is ludicrous.2 replies 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@travisbrown@coltfred@eed3si9n@d6@huitseeker finding the common super type is wrong?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @channingwalton
@channingwalton@travisbrown@coltfred@eed3si9n@d6@huitseeker delaying errors to runtime for zero benefit is wrong.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@travisbrown@coltfred@eed3si9n@d6@huitseeker so scala should not infer the common supertype? (sorry, trying to understand)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @channingwalton
@channingwalton@coltfred@d6@dibblego@eed3si9n@huitseeker@travisbrown the common supertype is Any, you know there's something wrong.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @puffnfresh
@puffnfresh@coltfred@d6@dibblego@eed3si9n@huitseeker@travisbrown yes, but is it scala’s job to prevent that silliness?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@channingwalton @puffnfresh @coltfred @d6 @eed3si9n @huitseeker @travisbrown it is the job of a useful type system and scala claims to have
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.