.@puffnfresh So as a proponent of monadic promises, presumably you disagree w/ @headinthebox? Care to state your case? :)
-
-
Replying to @littlecalculist
@littlecalculist mostly agree with@headinthebox. Dualities! Except I think JS can and should only have semi-comonadic, not fully comonadic.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @puffnfresh
@puffnfresh Also: is "semi-comonadic" a formal or informal term here?2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @littlecalculist
@littlecalculist term Semicomonad has been used by both@kmett and@dibblego. Also known as Extend. Has precedence.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @puffnfresh
@puffnfresh@kmett@dibblego ...and then still have a valid comonad1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @littlecalculist
@littlecalculist @puffnfresh @kmett Comonad requires F a -> a (not Promise). Other not-comonad semicomonads are [] and Maybe. @headinthebox
7:38 PM - 30 Jun 2013
0 replies
1 retweet
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.