"The entirety of OOP design can be approximated as a list of functions scoped in a closure bound to a publicly mutable context."
-
-
Replying to @runarorama
@runarorama That misses open recursion entirely. It also assumes mutation, which isn't a requirement.2 replies 2 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @djspiewak
@djspiewak@runarorama you're assuming OOP has a definition.3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @puffnfresh
@puffnfresh@runarorama There is an existence proof for that assumption, so I think it’s a safe one.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @djspiewak
@djspiewak@puffnfresh@runarorama there are as many "existence proofs" (lol) as there are suckers who believe in the bullshit.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@puffnfresh@runarorama Well that’s constructive…1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @djspiewak
@djspiewak @puffnfresh @runarorama "true absent sarcasm."
2:45 PM - 14 Mar 2013
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.