The best description of higher-order functions, functors and monads I've ever read: http://bit.ly/Uxy2s1
-
-
-
-
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@johnmyleswhite which bits? I read it after a long day admittedly1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cartazio
@cartazio@johnmyleswhite I just reread it. All of it is wrong.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@johnmyleswhite I must be filling in the gaps correctly reflexively when I read it. Could you be more explicit please?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cartazio
@cartazio@johnmyleswhite No that is not why monads are used. No that is not what functor means, nor monad. Not even teensy-weensy close.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@cartazio@johnmyleswhite I stop reading things like that as soon as they claim monads are for side effects.2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes
Replying to @purefn
@purefn @cartazio @johnmyleswhite Good policy.
12:01 PM - 6 Jan 2013
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.