@jedws That's the take I had on it about 5 years ago, some "Master Craftsman" he is.
-
-
Replying to @seanparsons
@seanparsons there are others who are starting the path of enlightenment though1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @seanparsons
@seanparsons I thought it was a reasonable take on the essential nature of FP – as distinct from imperative – if a little clumsy.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jedws
@jedws@seanparsons the pure functional approach to imperative programming is by far the most practical. Careful of a false dichotomy.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@seanparsons definitely, but we're talking about the first dawnings of an understanding of purity and its benefits1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jedws
@jedws@seanparsons Stronger in that case. Avoid false dilemma especially if don't understand the subject (like Uncle Bob and his readers).1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@jedws@seanparsons What are your objections to the article?4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @davetchepak
@davetchepak@jedws@seanparsons I haven't read it, I just know Bob doesn't know the subject well, so avoiding mythology now is paramount1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@davetchepak@seanparsons please do, he is on the road to getting it1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@jedws @davetchepak @seanparsons yeah I can see that, but I hope he gets it before writing too many more articles!
-
-
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@jedws@davetchepak@seanparsons +1 .. Practice before u preach#toomanypreachers3 replies 2 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @debasishg
@debasishg Where's that leave people who blog to learn a practice? I find it useful to order my thoughts. //@dibblego@jedws@seanparsons1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.