-
-
Replying to @ricky_clarkson
@ricky_clarkson@dibblego There must be a reasonable explanation. I just can't think of it. Right? Right???2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ricky_clarkson
@ricky_clarkson@nuttycom Iterable is an even bigger prank imo.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego They're planning to switch from that to a Stream type. I'd say it looks in ok hands from a library PoV. http://bit.ly/SKXLNU2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ricky_clarkson
@ricky_clarkson You do realise that getting Stream right is much harder than the problems that they have already failed at?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @ricky_clarkson
@ricky_clarkson That's the only way to not render the whole thing useless c.f. scala.Stream
10:26 PM - 9 Oct 2012
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.