@djspiewak you don't like Try? I'd be curious to hear why.
-
-
Replying to @jeremycloud
@jeremycloud It's extremely redundant. It does nothing (sound) that can't be done with Either.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @djspiewak
@djspiewak@jeremycloud we didn’t like Either, we felt the name didn’t communicate what we wanted but decided on more than a typedef6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @stevej
@stevej@jeremycloud And that I think is what bugs me most of all. I heard *nothing* about Try prior to its unheralded arrival on master.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @djspiewak
@djspiewak@jeremycloud like most code it had humble origins. /cc@marius2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @stevej
@stevej@jeremycloud@marius I don't dispute its origins, or its usefulness, but it shouldn't be in the standard library.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @djspiewak
@djspiewak@stevej@jeremycloud its distinguished feature is just the way it composes. it naturally represents a future's state.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @marius
@marius@stevej@jeremycloud Either composes just fine. Better than Try actually, since it doesn't have the soundness issues.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @djspiewak
@djspiewak Gist a couple of failing test cases? /cc@marius@stevej@jeremycloud1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @viktorklang
@viktorklang@stevej@jeremycloud The post by@marius gives the general form of one such failing test case, curtesy of@dibblego.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@djspiewak @viktorklang @stevej @jeremycloud @marius There are actually many problems. I was just showing the easiest one to observe.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.