@raphscallion @runarorama @jedws @purefn can you support the claim that is the primary purpose? And have I been doing it wrong?
-
-
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@runarorama@jedws@purefn Basing it on what they're designed for. Other uses certainly aren't wrong, but I'd say secondary.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @raphscallion
@raphscallion@runarorama@jedws@purefn Are you just making stuff up? And is that a responsible method to protect people's lives?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@raphscallion@runarorama@purefn wait, you want to dispute whether or not a gun is a weapon?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jedws
@jedws@raphscallion@runarorama@purefn Nope, just know why a circle of unreason should be taken seriously. A frying-pan is a weapon.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@raphscallion@runarorama@purefn a frying pan is a weapon, therefore all weapons should be uncontrolled?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jedws
@jedws@raphscallion@runarorama@purefn I think "controlling weapons" is funny, in layers.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@raphscallion@runarorama@purefn so, you're ok with everybody having unfettered access to guns? What about bombs?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jedws
@jedws@raphscallion@runarorama@purefn do you think the reason I do not shoot you is because of a law or controlled access?4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@raphscallion@runarorama@purefn but it would concern trying to argue the existence of OO with you with a loaded gun on the table1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@jedws @raphscallion @runarorama @purefn you under-estimate how funny I think the OO non-idea is.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.