Tony Morris

@raphscallion @runarorama @jedws @purefn I am asking you to unify your claim with observation. Which is wrong; the observation or claim?

@dibblego @runarorama @jedws @purefn I answered that. Primary purpose: harm. It's what they're designed for. Other usages don't change that.

@raphscallion @runarorama @jedws @purefn can you support the claim that is the primary purpose? And have I been doing it wrong?

@dibblego @runarorama @jedws @purefn Basing it on what they're designed for. Other uses certainly aren't wrong, but I'd say secondary.

@raphscallion @runarorama @jedws @purefn Are you just making stuff up? And is that a responsible method to protect people's lives?

@dibblego @raphscallion @runarorama @purefn wait, you want to dispute whether or not a gun is a weapon?

@jedws @raphscallion @runarorama @purefn Nope, just know why a circle of unreason should be taken seriously. A frying-pan is a weapon.

@dibblego @raphscallion @runarorama @purefn a frying pan is a weapon, therefore all weapons should be uncontrolled?