I'm willing to spend a few hours showing you my methods for teaching monad to coworkers, university students and randoms. I'm not sure you're interested in addressing criticisms though.
-
I understand more than enough of it to be providing value to my audience, to be accomplishing my goals, and to provide useful paths to learn more. I also have people guiding and helping me. I understand you discount all that.
How are you assessing that it is helping your audience? If I told you that "monads are fluffy dogs", then I have achieved points 1 and 2, right? Does that also mean I am helping?pic.twitter.com/9UkGM3ZNSz
-
-
Perhaps the question you might have led with, instead of all the derision, would be, "what are you trying to accomplish?" and an important follow-up might have been "what have you already learned and accomplished?" That's where I would have started. Not "you know nothing".
-
But, I didn't say, "you know nothing." I said you don't understand monads, at an elementary level. This is easily verifiable. Do you want me to list all the things I don't understand at an elementary level? I am quite comfortable in doing so, but may run out of room.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.