I have no idea what "imperative monads in Scala or Haskell" is, so I guess yes, it is a fantastic day for that!
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
I would say imperative monad = XT IO for some X ? I.e. the "main monad" of most real world programs, unfortunately.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @multix_labs @luqui and
Yes, of course I want to say that. I have no idea why people believe these things. I am somewhat liberated from von Neumann style since 1977.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
But only because someone else (or maybe you contribute) wrote the compiler, which produces code that Morlocks away in von Neumann style down below so you (and the rest of us writing Haskell sometimes) can Elohim away in our purely functional Elysium.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
-
(I know Backus. Still, the output of ghc is not at all liberated from the von Neumann style, is it?)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Can we (the programmer) be liberated? Yes, to some significant extent, though not absolutely. I used an Int last week.
-
-
I chuckled.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.