The next time you call someone "toxic" or a "troll", reflect on how casually you did so, with absolute social acceptance, encouragement and impunity. That's what it was like to call someone a faggot or homo (pejoratively) in the 1980s. History repeats.
-
-
Replying to @dibblego
Do you see these two groups as comparable in their degree of harm to others? Is "intolerance of intolerance" acceptable to you? What terms do you prefer or suggest?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ChadScherrer
There is no such things as "these groups" with any "degree of harm", so I cannot answer any further.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dibblego
Gay people are not a group? There are never harmful actions online? Really?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ChadScherrer
Gay people and not-gay people are individuals. There is no purpose in "grouping them" with respect to "degree of harm to others." "Trolls" do not exist. There are no groups to discuss.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dibblego
Guess we're using the terms differently. Gay people are individuals with a common attribute that leads to some common experiences (by hate groups, etc) and concerns (equal rights). I see "troll" as descriptive of online abuse or disregard of individual harm. You?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Since the 1980s, we have gone from "faggots who destroy the fabric of society" to "people with certain preferences in the privacy of their bedroom". That accuracy is important. Try doing that for "troll" and "toxic" and other hyperbolic nonsense. It feels good!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.