Really, in the end, static vs dynamic type systems is about mindest, and how you approach developing software. Both have upsides and downsides. This is why you see lots of systems that aren't purely one or the other!
Show this thread
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Citing tony is not going to convince me of anything
-
-
An invitation to confuse the map with the territory.
-
But this doesn't happen with well designed static type systems. I've been writing Haskell for 15 years. Not once did it happen. Might you be referring to "not-really" static typing?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.