Tony Morris

If all you have is a Monad, everything begins to look like a >>=. We do understand. Many Rustaceans also have FP knowledge. Just because something works in one language does not mean it will in another. The thread they linked contained a very thorough explanation as to why.

Boats has a very deep technical understanding of this stuff. To be dismissive of this as if people haven't spent the time to think this over, as if no thought process has gone into it, and discount years worth of technical and design work is saddening.

You don't understand the practical purpose of monads and now you are angry. and now you're sad? It's pretty obvious from reading the weirdly defensive justification that there is not a good understanding. It's OK to not understand a thing.

Lmao I've worked using Haskell professionally for 3 years and used Rust for 3 years. I understand why we can't. Not gonna bother arguing with you further.

and I've been using Haskell professionally for 15 years, so what? It's OK to not understand some things, even if "used Haskell for years." I've seen it before. Today, I will not understand a thing. It's not a big deal. As to the weirdly defensive justification, it's bollocks.

hey bud just here to tell you that unless you make a big change in your life you will never fill that hole you feel inside you and you will never be happy

FYI, that signature in the document that you claim is different to >>= is actually the same as >>= We should change that while I am changing my life and stuff.

what two signatures are equivalent