If he were not such an arrogant jerk, he would've investigated a little further and discovered why monads are not an adequate solution for Rust. Here's a thread in which I explain this at length:https://twitter.com/withoutboats/status/1027702531361857536 …
You don't understand the practical purpose of monads and now you are angry. and now you're sad? It's pretty obvious from reading the weirdly defensive justification that there is not a good understanding. It's OK to not understand a thing.
-
-
Lmao I've worked using Haskell professionally for 3 years and used Rust for 3 years. I understand why we can't. Not gonna bother arguing with you further.
-
and I've been using Haskell professionally for 15 years, so what? It's OK to not understand some things, even if "used Haskell for years." I've seen it before. Today, I will not understand a thing. It's not a big deal. As to the weirdly defensive justification, it's bollocks.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
It's ok not to understand Rust. This attitude isn't helping anyone. It's okay to come back when you know what you're trying to say.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.