This really is my team's Code of Conduct. https://gist.github.com/tonymorris/90522094bb964fd0d7bb42acd43ff4fb … as in, we strive to take it as seriously as is practical.
Try to address the specifics of the post, instead of the properties of the person. I know it's The Scala Way to discard critical analysis in favour of properties of a person, but it won't help you in the end. No, there are no successful companies because of Scala.
-
-
1/ "No, there are no successful companies because of Scala." - not what I said. I don't think there are many companies that are successful *because* of a language. There are many companies that use Scala heavily and are successful in doing so. Case in point Twitter.
-
OK, I just wanted to clarify that in the brevity of Twitter. Yes, there are successful companies, despite having used Scala. Please don't put people in tribes. I hold 3x Sun Java Certifications and used to work on the JDK. Am I still in the tribe? Not even no.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
2/ Will happily write something up to address the points specifically, but it won't fit in a tweet.
-
Goodo. Just to be clear, it is a very generous critique. I look forward to a response. Those who know Scala well have discussed this subject at great length and continue to do so. You're welcome to join that discussion.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.