Writing Scala is, as a matter of fact, one which can be analysed, critically, unethical.
-
Ethics and morality are a social construct, meaning they are defined by the culture and social circumstances of the individual. So, are subjective by definition.
-
-
His conjectures on objective morality are interesting, but the scientific method requires proof. I have seen no objective measure of good vs evil, or positive and negative state of mind. The fact that he admits most intellectuals don’t agree with his conjecture says a lot!
-
No, the scientific method requires evidence. There is a critical difference. The fact that many people disagree says nothing. Most people disagree that Scala is a total waste of time. That's because they are demonstrably wrong. This fallacy can go and on, and on.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.