Fact: Scala could improve a lot without all these community silos
Scalaz: just dump OO and everyone that does OO
Typelevel: it’s all good, Scala 3 is god-given. Kumbaya 
Lightbend: go do Haskell if you want to do FP
Me: I guess it’s time to find another language to do OSS
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Misinterpreting outsiders is what creates silos and tribalism, and that's tribalism on tribalism. But the Scalaz tribe does think Scala must change in fundamental ways, those are the changes that Lightbend said no to, so that tribe announced doom.
-
-
I don’t think Scala can be better than Haskell at pure FP, not sure why the drama about it
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Once again, Scalaz has improper focus on it for calling to attention problems that Scala could potentially face in the future. Meanwhile, a leader of TL doubles down on banlists for Lambdaconf attendees: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DiIlXYEWAAAJOpo.jpg:large …
-
There’s a lot of bad blood between people, I spoke twice at LC so I might be on some list somewhere... I’m not sure what it has to do Lightbend or moving Scala towards Haskell
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
"announced doom" was lazy, but I stand by the rest — I'm also implying that's not bad faith, unlike https://twitter.com/gclaramunt/status/1018501250059591681 … (which is a tribal response).
This Tweet is unavailable. -
It seems also plain to me Scalaz has tribal characters — which is unrelated to the correct opinion on the technical disagreements.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.