For my own learning, i.e. not a suggestion, what would be lost if
class EncodeJson m n a | m a -> n where
https://github.com/argonaut-io/argonaut-hs/blob/master/src/Data/Argonaut/Encode.hs#L22 …
were defined as
class EncodeJson a
like, as I understand, https://github.com/argonaut-io/argonaut/blob/master/argonaut/shared/src/main/scala/argonaut/EncodeJson.scala#L12 …?
@dibblego? Thanks!
I think that's an improvement, though I wouldn't make it a type-class. We are actually implementing this for haskell at the moment.
-
-
I didn’t see any open GitHub issues - I’d be interested to contribute in any way if it’s welcome. I’m a beginner Haskeller, but have used Argonaut in prod for the past year on a few projects
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.