If you used Monero between July 2016 and September 2017, there's a 91% chance that your transactions can be conclusively traced. Non-RingCT Monero was wildly unsafe. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1704.04299/
-
-
Replying to @dguido
@fluffypony worry about this instead of being the twitter troll you love to be1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @CapAndGoSports @dguido
Utterly nonsensical Tweet. RingCT went live in January 2017, and was well over 90% of txs almost immediate, and sitting on 98%+ up to September 2017 when it became mandatory. RingCT outputs couldn’t be spent in non-RingCT txs. So
@dguido is lying, disingenuously or otherwise.1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @fluffypony @CapAndGoSports
I’m quoting from the research paper.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dguido @CapAndGoSports
No, you’re misquoting it. You’re correct only until Jan 2017, and then the actual percentage drops to a small fraction as non-RingCT transactions become increasongly impossible overnight.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @fluffypony @CapAndGoSports
Ah yes, here’s the correct stat. It’s still pretty horrifying.pic.twitter.com/pQxqbJtltD
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @dguido @CapAndGoSports
Yes - the paper's analysis couldn't even extend past January 2017, which means this is a solved problem. Your original Tweet is provably a lie: "If you used Monero between July 2016 and September 2017, there's a 91% chance that your transactions can be conclusively traced." wtf
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes
Sorry! I didn't mean to get the dates wrong. Of course, the findings are correct regardless during the time period indicated in the paper.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.