Before I begin, I think the MAIAN analysis tool is a useful advance to the field and we plan to incorporate some of their features into Manticore in the coming months. My main issue is with their evaluation of results.
-
-
Oops! Lost in Twitter's threaded replies: "For example, they could have only counted contracts with at least X transactions or contracts that received more than Y ethers. Defining some kind of low watermark is essential for reviewing contracts on public chains."
Show this thread -
Quoting a few tweets so they show up in threaded replies: "The only contract address cited in this paper never had any ether sent to it"https://twitter.com/computerality/status/966802544247869440 …
Show this thread -
Ethereum mainnet was once used as a testnethttps://twitter.com/maurelian_/status/966810648171765760 …
Show this thread -
It's 2018. If you publish research, publish your data too.https://twitter.com/defendtheworld/status/966801561694490628 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Agreed. In the age of github, which is right now, one of the wonders of Academia is seeing data and code for reproducible results. Ten years ago college students had to forge around AFS for remote home directories for these things
-
YOU DID WHAT
-
There's this thing called Internet2 where students of universities can choose to share their home directories over AndrewFS
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The only contract address cited in this paper never had any ether sent to it https://etherscan.io/address/0x4671ebe586199456ca28ac050cc9473cbac829eb …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.