.@CSIS: No. No. Nope. No. No. (never put a blockchain on what you want to stay secret) https://csis.us11.list-manage.com/track/click?u=833ec271d60c6750d9c3baaac&id=300f98c46f&e=2c2c8487bd … cc @kiniry
You might want to look into Quorum and Constellation, two foundational tools in an emerging field of permissioned blockchains that preserve privacy as a first class feature. https://github.com/jpmorganchase/quorum …
-
-
sounds like I should change my tune to: “don’t put things on non-PQE unpersmissioned privacy-unpreserving blockchains” ::)
-
Or just “you should use Quorum”
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sorry, but I just spent fifteen minutes trying to find a specification of the Quorum protocol, with no luck. Can someone point me in the right direction so that I can actually assess its (unspoken?) correctness and security properties? /me not impressed so far
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Blockchains are great for decentralized processes, but elections already need a central authority, as discussed in the literature and summarized here, so blockchains are overkill and add unneeded complexity:https://medium.com/@nealmcb/blockchains-are-great-for-audits-but-not-elections-7cd16e75927c …
-
I don't disagree with you. I only wanted to address the misconception that blockchains cannot address issues of data and transaction privacy. Thanks for the extra election-specific info!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.