That could be a very dangerous precedent :(
-
-
That's an awful precedent that shows why I and others fought against criminalization of exploit code
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
That's only if you believe he didn't write Kronos. There's a lot more evidence popping up on Google and old chat logs saying differently.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Nope, that actually applies regardless. Punishing people because they wrote code is bad.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Uhh but he would have wrote and sold a banking trojan to people he knew would use it for crime, and he took feature reqs from them. Really?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
That, if proven, would be a separate thing from "he wrote the code". And still there's this detail of "due process" before we condemn him.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
The indictment clearly shows they're not arresting him simply because he "wrote some code." And his already public logs clearly show intent.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
The indictment shows what they want to prove. Not proof. And once again there is this detail that he needs to be convicted first.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
It looks pretty clear to me! Why the race to defend him over any other malware dev? Because he has a Twitter/Github/shows up to parties?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I'm not defending anybody. I repeat: I just don't blindly trust police's allegations.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
FTR: I take it on a case by case basis. I surely don't trust them all the time either.
-
-
Yeah, it was pretty quick to dig up his blackhat persona.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.