This whole thing is crazy. It's clear that he COULD have broken the law. I'm not saying he did but this blind defense of him is insane.
Evidence on him was easily Google-able. I have very little affinity for people who maliciously steal from others. Certain new charges coming
-
-
-
I don't know Marcus but between defense and accusation, the only one you're allowed to do in absence of evidence is defense.
-
The FBI is claiming to have evidence proving his involvement. Why shouldn't we give them the benefit of the doubt in a very plausible case?
-
They claim to have evidence - they're allowed to accuse. We don't have evidence. Things get out of hand quickly if we go down this path.
-
This is insane. This is not a court. Wait for an actual court to make a determination. Just stop saying he's innocent. You don't know.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.