Because... we presume guilty until proven innocent and don't provide people legal counsel?
-
-
It looks to me like EFF simply reacts to oppose all actions from the FBI, they're anti-government rather than pro-"your rights online"
-
Perhaps because I'm much more anti-FBI than the EFF, I don't find them anti-FBI enough.
-
hahaha
-
pro-"your rights online" is defacto anti-government
-
I don't mean to be that guy ... but it's counsel when referring to lawyers and council is like a group of people working on problems.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Perhaps wait and see why
@OrinKerr finds the indictment somewhat problematic? -
Looking forward to it!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It's an offer for everyone who makes solid contributions to the security research community.
-
I assume. Because they've spent considerable resources on security researchers, and little on malware criminals.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
As an
@eff donor, my answer is yes! and he is knowns as a researcher and not yet proven he is a criminal.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@eff offering help doesn't mean they'll end up defending him, fair to let them evaluate his case, esp. given his profileThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
To step up for researchers at least until facts are better known? Yes. To mount full blown defenses for malware devs? No.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You've already found him guilty. Sad, Dan. Very sad.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.