Is anyone else surprised WannaCry and NotPetya didn't cause more damage?
Given proclamations about US exposure to techrisk, I expected to suffer personal impact or see direct natsec impact. Kinda disappointed!
-
-
That's because most of the damage was unreported and both worms were artificially limited in scope for different interesting reasons.
-
WannaCry was 9 weeks after a patch, and "only" corps with inbound SMBv1 and 9-week unpatched machines affected.
-
NotPetya was anyone using MEDoc, but that was *also* curiously limited. Imagine the catastrophe if was e.g. RDP 0day, or, say, a Dell update
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.