Agreed. If you can't think of a way you monetise a popular site without a paywall, you suck at marketing - and have no long-term plan
-
-
-
It's not exactly a paywall, it's just overloading the site with intrusive ads. I pay the WSJ to get by the paywall! That's legit.
-
If you pay, surely you shouldn't get ads? That's paying twice.
-
Oh, I don't get ads on the WSJ. I was bringing them up as a good player. I don't pay for Forbes.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I blocked Forbes in Google search results because of this
-
I know, right? It violates the Google AdSense policy. Not sure how they're still Google customer. https://support.google.com/adsense/answer/48182?hl=en …
-
Don't know, don't care, they pissed me off so badly (with Adblock detection false positive) I don't ever want to read anything there
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I never understood the point of that annoying page.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
uBlock origin does the job
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
first forbes, then wired
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I had to lookup "interstitial".
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.