This article didn't seem particularly terrible. Which parts am I supposed to notice were egregiously incorrect?
-
-
-
Has anyone looked at the SB releases to see if 1/3 of them were known within a year?pic.twitter.com/lx0yElEWQT
-
That seems to be from a cited paper, which I didn't dive into. The only bad bit from Bruce himself is the sugg'd 6 month VEP change
-
The idea that giving bugs to the vendors is going to solve anything, or is in any way realistic, is a fantasy.
-
Because to do so would be to give up on modern signals intelligence, or because it wouldn’t accomplish anything for defenders?
-
Kinda a combo of both, plus be massively expensive for no reason?
-
End state being NSA vuln research has no real reason to exist => no NSA vuln research => rest of world still does it => no better off?
-
More importantly the halfway point of "hold bugs for some amount of time" is even worse -> bad opsec + expensive.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I'll get there any day now, pretty soon I'll be talking about politics
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don't get it - article seemed reasonable. But clearly missed something if Thomas felt a retweet was worthwhile.
-
Thomas has his pet peeves and personal crusades. He probably doesn't like him because Schneier wrote something nice about Snowden
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
At least he uses the Oxford Comma...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Peak Dunning-Kruger" = needs to become a thing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
no surprise there since he decided to join Snowden & co in the "NSA is the source of all evil" campaign
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Been saying that for years...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.