This is the privacy community realizing how outclassed they are from yrs of shunning anyone who understands security https://medium.com/@privacyint/in-defense-of-offensive-hacking-tools-33c9922bde02 …
-
-
Replying to @dguido
So many poorly framed arguments but my fave is leading with "in defense of offense hacking" then ending with denigrating it.
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
-
Replying to @blackswanburst @dguido
For a start, the piece was titled "in defense of offensive tools" not "in defense of offensive hacking".
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @blackswanburst
How do you simultaneously dismiss notions of white and blackhat then apply those parameters to those who release vs don't in the conclusion?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dguido
I don't dismiss white hat & black hat. I just recognise that monochrome doesn't capture the full range of ethical and unethical behaviours.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @blackswanburst @dguido
It used to be a useful linguistic idiom but is increasingly useless.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @blackswanburst @dguido
As for the conclusion I merely ask the audience not to confuse the two. It is up to the reader to decide the ethics in their view.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Don't insult me with that "asking the reader to decide" nonsense.
-
-
-
Replying to @blackswanburst @dguido
Is that it? I was just wrong for using chapeau references?
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.