No, Wikileaks deserves it here. Contract forces recipient to acknowledge material is stolen, including origin. That's the risk
correct, it's illegal to do so, fruit of a poisoned tree. And Assange is forcing them to acknowledge it's illegal.
-
-
I'm not US, but isn't that just re admissibility of evidence. Thanks for the discussion. Let's hope they figure it out
-
I'm substituting terms for brevity on Twitter. It opens a host of nasty legal issues. Yes, hope USG reports soon.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.