contract terms are immaterial. Companies will be taking fruit from poisoned tree / parties to illegal conspiracy if signed.
No, Wikileaks deserves it here. Contract forces recipient to acknowledge material is stolen, including origin. That's the risk
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What should Wikileaks do?
-
they should have sent unsolicited without acknowledging origin. E.g., "hey this fell off the back of a truck."
-
instead, signing a contract appears like concocted ploy to ensure company lawyers reject their solicitation.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.